TMG Blog

Buying wine for someone whose taste you do not know

You need a bottle for someone by Friday. You know their name, roughly their seniority, and nothing whatsoever about what they drink. Every instinct says to spend more, because spending more feels like it covers the uncertainty. It does not — it just makes a wrong guess more expensive. The useful first step is to work out which of two completely different gifts you are buying, because the correct bottle for one is the wrong bottle for the other.

Two different purchases wearing the same wrapping

The wine as a social object. A client, a boss, a business partner, a family elder you barely know, a Mid-Autumn or Lunar New Year obligation. The bottle will be seen by others, may be re-gifted, and may sit on a shelf for a year. Here the label does most of the work, and the wine's job is to be recognised and correct.

The wine as a drink. A friend, a colleague you like, a host at dinner. It will be opened, possibly that night, by people who will actually taste it. Here the label barely matters and the drinkability matters enormously.

Most bad wine gifts come from buying the first kind of bottle for the second kind of occasion, or the reverse. Decide first.

If it is a social object

Buy the recognisable name in the price band that matches the relationship, and stop optimising. This is the one situation where the famous label is genuinely the right answer, because being read correctly is the entire function. An obscure, better wine that nobody at the table has heard of fails at the job you actually hired it for.

Practical points that matter more than the wine here: presentation box or bag, an unmarked bottle in good condition, and even numbers if you are giving more than one. Champagne and well-known Bordeaux carry the clearest signal in Hong Kong. That is a fact about our market, not a claim about quality.

If it is going to be drunk

Now the question is which wine is hardest to get wrong across an unknown palate. Ranked by how safely they land:

  • Champagne, or good traditional-method sparkling. The widest hit rate of anything. It suits almost any food, it is festive without requiring an occasion, and it needs no decanting or special glassware. Non-vintage from an established house is the safe form.
  • A red that is already soft and ready. Rioja Reserva is the classic answer — it is released with several years of age already on it, the tannins are resolved, and it goes with roast meats, cheese and a great deal of Chinese food. Aged Chianti Classico and mature-styled Southern Rhône work similarly.
  • A mid-weight white with some richness. A village-level white Burgundy or a good Alsace Pinot Gris pleases people who mostly drink white and does not offend people who mostly drink red.
  • A half-bottle of Sauternes or another sweet wine. Underrated as a gift. It looks generous, it keeps for weeks after opening, and the recipient does not need to plan an evening around it.

What not to buy for someone whose taste you do not know

  • Anything young and tannic. A serious young Bordeaux, Barolo or Napa Cabernet asks the recipient to own a decanter, have two hours, and know to wait. They will open it next Tuesday with a takeaway, find it hard and drying, and quietly conclude they do not like expensive wine.
  • Anything that needs cellaring. Giving a bottle that will not be ready for eight years is giving somebody a storage problem. In a Hong Kong flat it will not survive the wait anyway.
  • Magnums, unless you know their kitchen. They do not fit in a normal fridge, they are unwieldy in a small flat, and they require a large gathering to justify.
  • Anything unusual chosen to be interesting. Orange wine, high-acid natural wine, sherry, heavily funky reds — all can be wonderful, and all are acquired tastes. Save them for people whose taste you know.
  • Wine at all, if they do not drink. This sounds obvious and gets ignored constantly.

The advice that is wrong

"When in doubt, spend more." Doubt is not fixed by money. A HK$2,000 young structured red given to someone who drinks white with fish is a worse gift than a HK$500 Champagne, and the recipient will experience it as worse regardless of the price you paid.

"Everyone likes Champagne." Almost everyone does, which is why it tops the list, but a small number of people genuinely dislike bubbles, and some will not open it because they are waiting for an occasion. If you know they never celebrate anything, choose the still wine.

"Buy them something you love." Only if you also plan to be in the room. A gift chosen entirely around the giver's taste is a recommendation, not a present.

The one question that solves most of it

Ask whoever invited you, or a mutual colleague: "Do they drink red or white?" That single answer removes about half the risk, costs nothing, and is not a socially awkward question. If you can get a second answer — whether they like it light or full — you are close to being able to choose properly.

If you can get no information at all, the honest default is a well-made Champagne, or a Rioja Reserva with a few years on it, in a good box, at a price that reflects the relationship rather than your anxiety. Both will be opened, both will be finished, and neither asks the recipient to do any work. That is what a wine gift is supposed to achieve.

Where to start

Decide first whether the bottle is a social object or a drink, then buy whatever is hardest to get wrong for that job. If you can get no information at all, these are the honest defaults — both will be opened, both will be finished, and neither asks the recipient to do any work.

이전의
What a 94-point score records, and what it does not
다음
What each step up the wine price ladder actually buys